Here's a find from
today:
Brown Creeper (Certhia Americana), Van Patton Woods FP, Lake Co, IL, 1/11/14 |
So, is it a male, or
a female?
Well, obviously the
birds figure it out, since they're fairly common across the entire US, but even
if you were holding the bird (as banders do), you probably wouldn't be able to
tell the difference. There are no plumage differences, birds have no external
genitalia, and even structural measurements (wing length, bill length, etc.)
all overlap nearly completely. (During the breeding season it's possible, which
is how we got those measurements on known birds.)
Here's another
example of a species that's very difficult to tell.
Black-capped Chickadee (Poecile atricapilla), Bear Creek Nature Center, El Paso Co, CO, 1/1/14 |
When I was working
with them, we used wing length to tell males from females, since plumage
features don't seem to work. So, how do the birds themselves figure it out?
There's a lot we
don't know -- we can guess that behavior, especially vocal behavior, accounts
for a lot of it. But a close relative of the Black-capped Chickadee illustrates
another possibility, one that I suspect our chickadees use as well. Blue Tits
(Cyanistes caerulea) are monomorphic (males and females look alike), or at
least they look like it to us. But, when you examine them in near UV light,
males have obvious crown and chest patches that females don’t. (1) In other words, they
are sexually dimorphic, when you look at them the way that other Blue Tits see
them! (Yes, Tits and most other birds can see into what we call ultraviolet
light.)
This pattern appears
to be quite common among birds (2,3) , which means that many of our ideas regarding
sexual selection in birds are being revised, since they were based on an
important misunderstanding of which birds show dimorphism. (4)
There is a more
general point to be made here, with regards to studies on animal behavior. If
you’re trying to determine how a bird or any other animal is reacting to the
information available to it, it’s important to know just what information is
available! A classic example, to my mind, is the mirror test – if you present a
puppy with a mirror, they often act aggressive towards the puppy they see in
the mirror. I’ve rarely, if ever, heard anyone point out how important scent is
to a dog’s view of the world, though, and I have yet to hear of a mirror that
smells like a puppy!
(1) Andersson, S., örnborg,
J.& Andersson, M. (1998) Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative
mating in blue tits. Proc. R. Soc.
Lond. B 265 (1395) 445-450
(2) Eaton, M. D. (2005).
Human vision fails to distinguish widespread sexual dichromatism among sexually
“monochromatic” birds. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The
United States Of America, 102(31), 10942-10946.
(3) Mullen, P., &
Pohland, G. (2008). Studies on UV reflection in feathers of some 1000 bird
species: are UV peaks in feathers correlated with violet-sensitive and
ultraviolet-sensitive cones?. Ibis, 150(1), 59-68.
(4) Burns, K., & Shultz, A. (2012). Widespread cryptic dichromatism and ultraviolet reflectance in the largest radiation of neotropical songbirds: implications of accounting for avian vision in the study of plumage evolution. Auk, 129(2), 211-221.
No comments:
Post a Comment